Pure Actuality: Some Application 2
ON IDOLATRY
The doctrine that God is purely actual implies that God is
more unlike the creation than anything could possibly be, and this implies that
all forms of idolatry are forms of blasphemy, which are really violations of
the second/third commandment.
First, let’s examine the claim that being purely actual is
more unlike the creation than anything could possibly be. A purely actual being
has no potentialities whatsoever. All beings with potentialities derive their
actuality from the one and only purely actual being (I will post something soon
on why there can be only one purely actual being). But every being other than
the purely actual being has potentialities. The easiest way to see this is to
consider the potentiality for non-existence. Every being other than a purely actual
being can fail to exist.* The only being that cannot fail to exist is the
purely actual being. It has no potential to cease to be. God as purely actual
is the ground of all other beings. All other beings get their being from God.
All other actual beings are actual in virtue of God’s actualizing them. That is
true of everything other than the purely actual being. Consider the actual state of affairs of your
knowing something. At one time you did not know that thing. Now you do. You
have actualized a bit of knowledge. But the purely actual being’s activity is
necessary for that movement from potentially knowing x to actually knowing x.
All, literally all, actual things, owe their being actual to God’s activity.
But God does not owe His being actual to the activity of anything at all. He
just is purely actual. And this implies that in God there is no division, no
real distinction between anything. In God, in the purely actual being,
knowledge cannot be distinct from power, or love, or goodness, or truth, or
beauty, or justice, or…. The purely actual being cannot have any real distinctions
within itself, because that would imply a difference between it and whatever it
is that is distinct from it. But then we would have a purely actual being AND
whatever it is that is distinct from it. So, we arrive at the doctrine of
divine simplicity. The purely actual being and the absolutely simple being are
the same being.
What all of this implies is that nothing that exists in all
of creation (not matter, not souls, not angels, not any instance of knowledge,
power, goodness, love, etc….) is the exact same as God. For each created thing,
no matter what it is, is a mixture of actuality and potentiality. In virtue of
being actual, created things are like God, who is purely actual. But no created
actuality can be identical to anything that God is. Our making images—golden,
silver, bronze, stone, wood, straw—of God is bad because whatever it is that we
make is something that is farther removed from imaging God than we are. Our
actuality is greater, in lots of senses, than any image we might make of him.
Our images of God are, in effect, images made by images. And nothing in
creation (Jesus, remember is fully human AND fully God) can be more than an
image. Treating the image as though it is identical to God is like treating a
doll as though it is identical to your child. This is true of images we make—statues,
pillars, buildings, money, cars, sports, politics, science, etc—and true of
those that we don’t. Furthermore, this implies that none of our ideas or
concepts can possibly perfectly represent God.
Those who have defended the doctrine that God is pure
actuality itself have also brought attention to dangers of conceptual idolatry.
Since, our concepts are acquired by interaction with the created realm, our
concepts cannot be exact representations of anything in God. All concepts
represent, in their primary sense, mixtures of potentiality and actuality. This
is even true of our concepts of abstract objects. We acquire those by stripping
away various particularities—we all have the concept of a human which we
acquire by removing the various particularities of individual humans. So, the
concept itself is acquired by our intellects abstracting away from the specific
features of something. The concept is made actual by removing things that are
merely potential, not essential, features of it. So, no concept perfectly
matches the purely actual being. Indeed, our concept of a purely actual being
is merely similar to the purely actual being itself. We are to worship God, not
our concept of God. Our concepts of God, just like all of the creation, are
images of Him, but can never exactly represent him or anything that He is. If
we forget that, we are liable to idolatrous thinking or conceptual idolatry.
The upshot of all of this is that all of our talk and
thinking about God is, when done rightly, analogical. Indeed, it seems the all
of the creation—everything that exists other than God—is analogical, and analogical
through and through. Here’s a famous example of this idea of analogy:
Some meals are healthy.
Some complexions are healthy.
Some organisms are healthy.
Note how the first two uses of ‘healthy’ are analogical,
depending on a grasp of the third, more fundamental use of the term. ‘Healthy’
in its primary sense refers to the functioning of an organism. The other uses
of ‘healthy’ relate to that primary use. Meals are healthy (or unhealthy) by
their contribution to the functioning of the organism that eats them, whereas
complexions are healthy (or unhealthy) by representing or being signs of health
in the organism.
Given all that has been said then all of our thoughts about
God—all attributions to God of power, goodness, knowledge, wisdom, love,
beauty, justice, anger, sorrow, etc—are analogical in a similar way that the
health example reveals. But it’s even more extreme. Since God is pure act (we
are supposing), and nothing else that is actual is purely actual, all
creaturely instances of attributes that can be applied to God are impure or
somehow related to the more fundamental reality of God. The power, goodness,
knowledge, etc. of the purely actual being is the primary and all other cases
are like those but are not the primary or most real instances. Just as healthy
meals or complexions are not the most genuine, most real, fundamental, pure
health, so the goodness, power, knowledge, etc of a creature is not the most genuine,
most real, fundamental, or pure. The purely actual being is the paradigm.
Everything else is an image. But remember that’s everything else—our thoughts, concepts, words, etc. So we cannot
escape the analogy. We cannot comprehend the reality that the analogies point
to. My existence is like God’s existence in various ways, but God exists more
fully, more purely, more completely, than I do (or anything I have ever
encountered in creation). And what it is to exist more fully, more purely, more
completely than anything in creation cannot be comprehended by us. God is
literally incomprehensible. He is beyond the creation in more ways than we can
imagine or conceive or comprehend.
Idolatry essentially denies that. It reduces God to a
creature, to a mere image. Think of someone you love. Do you love that person,
or do you love your image of that person? The latter is gross, nasty,
disgusting. It’s like loving the photo of the person more than the actual
person. When we engage in idolatrous thinking and living we misrepresent God to
the world. It’s like spreading lies about someone you deeply admire or love. It’s
like ruining their reputation, spoiling their name, and turning others away
from them. That’s what idolatry does. And that’s what blasphemy does. Blasphemy
is so bad because it points others away from God, the one who truly heals and
makes all things new; the one who brings fullness of life; the one who
satisfies our deepest longings. Blasphemy spreads lies of God and directs ours
and others’ attention, love, and worship to another. And that’s why the third commandment is so important. The third commandment tells us not to misuse or
carry the name of God in vain. Doing so is a form of idolatry. And we do that
whenever we, while carrying the name of God, point others away from him. May
our lives, words, thoughts, and actions, point others to the spring of life and
love; the one who alone truly is.
Comments
Post a Comment